There are 38 owner-reported body & structure complaints for the 2012 Mercedes-Benz C-Classin NHTSA's database. These are unverified consumer reports and may not reflect confirmed defects.
Rear subframe rotted out and broke due to corrosion. Rear crossmember is broken and needs replaced. My safety as well as the safely of other was put at risk. Loss of control at high speed could have been deadly. Luckily, I wasn’t going very fast at the time of incident or else who knows what would have happened to me or bystanders. Independent service center inspected and confirmed that incident was due to corrosion in the rear. They informed me of the extended warranty (20 years, unlimited miles) on 2008-2015 C300 models for this particular issue as my safety and the safety of others was put at risk. There were some symptoms leading up to the incident. At the time of braking the car would become unstable and feel skittish in the rear. It felt as if the rear was sliding to one side. The vehicle would also make some metal clinking noises at sharper turns. The symptoms had been more frequent in the prior 2-3 months of incident. The vehicle has been inspected and diagnosed by one shop and is currently getting a second opinion from another independent service center.
We are having issues when braking. The backend of the car wiggles when braking hard. Shop advised that the subframe on the passenger side completely broke away and on the driver side it is very rotted. They advised this is a safety issue since the broken side could pierce the gas tank. I googled this and found that there was a warranty extension for the same year and make car (document MC-10233796-0001) Spoke to the service department and they advised this did not apply to our VIN. I called the corporate number on the warranty extension letter and they advised the same. My complaint is that several other Mercedes models and makes have this issues and are covered. Why isn't ours? Based on images I found online it looks to be the exact failure mode. My son was supposed to drive the car 4.5 hours on the 4th and could have gotten into an accident or been stranded. I also read that in Germany they are fixing all vehicles with this issue.
This is a low mileage car with odometer reading of 25668 (less than 2000 miles per year), used sparingly and always parked in the garage. On 05/07/2024 I noticed brake fluid flowing from the left rear side of the car; on examination this seemed to come from the flexible hose that connects the brake fluid line to the brake caliper. I called my Mercedes-Benz (MB) dealer and arranged for further inspection and service. The technician identified that the brake fluid lines to the rear were both totally corroded and in need of immediate replacement. Since the lines were embedded behind the subframe it necissated lowering the subframe to access. Other parts were also severely corroded and required replacement. (see attached PDF of Invoice) The total cost of the repair was $4,592.93. The dealership applied a discount of $150.00 to this for an amount due of $4,442.93. As an engineer, I believe the material used for the brake fluid lines were unsuitable and furthermore were unprotected for the harsh environment experienced under the car, and I believe MB with all their experience in automobiles manufacturing over the years clearly should have known and forseen this fact; I do believe that MB is responsible for this premature failure of the brake lines of my car aven driven only 25,666 miles to date. I am therefore requesting NHTSA to require MB to reimburse me for the unnecessary expense of the costly repairs. It is only fortunate that this failure was identified in my garage and not on the highway. Please advise me of your resolution. Thank you.
car has a rear subframe damage from corrosion
Rear subframe is corroded, rusted through, and cracking.
The contact owns a 2012 Mercedes-Benz C300. The contact stated that the front driver's side interior door handle was fractured. The contact was unable to open the door from inside the vehicle. An independent mechanic inspected the vehicle and referred the contact to the manufacturer for assistance. The dealer was not notified of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and referred the contact to the NHTSA Hotline for assistance. The failure mileage was approximately 95,000.
Recently we had he brakes replaced and new tires put on to prepare for a trip out to Minnesota in a couple of weeks. My son felt like the car wasn’t driving correctly and took it to the shop and upon being put on the lift the service department called and said the rear subframe rusted out and was broken and the gas tank was scratched do to the subframe rubbing against it. When he called Mercedes they told him there was an extended warranty put on these cars which I never received a letter concerning this issue. *The car is waiting to be towed to Mercedes, they would not give us back the keys, it was too dangerous to drive. *my son unknowing drove this car on the highway putting himself and others in danger for who knows how long. If he did not take it in for a check before driving himself and his father to Minnesota they could have been killed. Perhaps a fire due to the gas tank damage. *confirmed by independent repair shop but will be seen when the car is towed to Mercedes. *there was no warning to the dangerous situation my family was placed in. The cars should have been recalled. We were told by Mercedes they were fixing the problem as it arises, luckily no one was injured or killed when this problem arose!
The contact owns a 2012 Mercedes-Benz C300. The contact stated that while driving approximately 55 MPH and pressing the brake pedal, the entire vehicle shifted to the left. Additionally, while driving at various speeds the vehicle was unstable and experienced vibration. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who discovered that the subframe of the vehicle had severe rusting and corrosion and that the vehicle was unsafe to operate. The vehicle was not yet repaired. The local dealer and manufacturer were not notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 95,000.
The contact owns a 2012 Mercedes-Benz C300. The contact stated while driving 30 MPH, she started hearing an abnormal sound. The contact stated no warning light was illuminated. The contact took the vehicle to the local dealer, where it was diagnosed with needing the rear subframe to be replaced due to severe corrosion. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer had been informed of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 120,000.
As per an inspection by my mechanic, the rear sub frame of the vehicle has cracked due to rust corrosion and subsequent metal failure. I first noticed the issue when there was a thumping sound over bumps and the car started to swerve when applying brakes on the highway, quite a scary situation as I thought the brakes were failing. The car has 78000 miles and has had all maintenance done. The is no other rust on or underneath the car. According to my research on Mercedes-Benz owner forums I discovered that it is a common issue and that, so far, Mercedes Benz has not issued a recall in the US. According to these forums Mercedes has issued recalls in other countries (although I have not confirmed this point). The estimated cost to replace the sub frame is $3000 including labor and there is an 8 to 10 week backlog for the part due to the number of failures occurring. In the meantime I cannot drive the vehicle as my mechanic has told me that the car is not safe to operate.
The contact owns a 2012 Mercedes Benz C300. The contact stated that while driving 45 MPH, the contact started to lose control of the vehicle while depressing the brake pedal. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact regained control of the vehicle and drove to a dealer. The vehicle was inspected, and the mechanic discovered that the subframe had fractured due to severe corrosion. The contact was notified that the vehicle was unsafe to drive. The contact was provided an estimate for the repair. The manufacturer was also notified of the failure and informed her that 15% of the cost of the repair would be covered. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 62,000. The contact stated that their vehicle was finally repaired by the dealer in Dec. 2022. The manufacturer helped pay approximately 13% of the total repair costs.
I have a 20212 Mercedes C300 with 70,000 miles. I took it into the MB dealership for inspection and was told that the rear subframe was rusted through. The subframe's failure also caused the brake lines to rust to the point of needing to be replaced. The subframe repair will cost $5,900 and the brake line replacement will cost around $1,200. The dealer told me the car couldn't be driven safely, so I had to leave it there to be repaired. There were no interior warning alarms about the structure or the brakes. According to forums on Benzworld.org, this is a known problem on these specific cars and the component is replaced for free by MB in Europe.
The rear subframe rusted and completely cracked. The car started to shake violently while I was on the highway. Fortunately I was in the right hand land and was able to slow down. I was driving in the car with my mother. My understanding from the mechanic is that we were lucky not to be killed or hurt anyone else. The frame is completely cracked. I called the local dealership and they said this is an extremely common problem. So common they have multiple vehicles on the lot waiting for parts, and the waitlist is indefinite. There were absolutely no warnings on the car.
The contact owns a 2012 Mercedes-Benz C300. The contact stated while driving 35 MPH, the contact heard an unusual noise coming from the rear of the vehicle. The vehicle was taken to the dealer, and the mechanic stated that the rear subframe was rusted and the passenger’s side rear control arm was detached from the subframe. The vehicle was repaired. The manufacturer was contacted and stated there was no recall for the failure. No other assistance was offered. The failure mileage was 43,960.
The contact owns a 2012 Mercedes-Benz C300. The contact stated that the vehicle was taken to the dealer for a routine maintenance check and she was informed by the dealer that there was a hole in the subframe. The contact was informed that the subframe needed to be replaced. No warning light was illuminated. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacture was not notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 80,000.
The contact owns a 2012 Mercedes-Benz C300. The contact stated that the vehicle was taken to be serviced under an unknown recall however, the mechanic informed him that the rear subframe was severely rusted, creating holes in the subframe. The dealer diagnosed that the subframe needed to be replaced. The vehicle had not been repaired due to the part being on backorder. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and informed the contact that there was no recall or warranty coverage for the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 65,500.
I’m filing a complaint due to a concern regarding the rear subframe of my vehicle becoming rotted/rusted out and falling apart at any time. This is due to a Mercedes Benz manufacturing issue where they tried cost cutting which turned out very poor quality materials for this very important assembly. I have researched online about this problem, and turns out, it is very common with this body style c300 ('08 - '14). There are hundreds, if not thousands, of individuals within the USA who are having this exact same issue with as little as 60,000 miles. Most are happening around the 90,000 mile mark however. They primarily mention in many online forums how scared they were when it happened and how lucky they are it didn’t cause a major accident…yet. My car only has ~110,000 miles and is just about 10 years of age. This issue should never happen for a vehicle with such low miles and such a short life, especially from a prominent and distinguished automotive company. This is a Huge Safety Concern, and I am Scared that this subframe will fail without warning and at a high speed, which can likely cause me to be involved in a major accident where people are killed or seriously injured. It is astonishing how this subframe was not recalled by now and how Mercedes USA has not taken responsibility for this. This issue needs to be addressed and recalled Immediately before people are killed or seriously injured, and before more of these parts break. Please look into this very soon as this is a very serious matter.
The contact owns a 2012 Mercedes-Benz C300. The contact stated that the vehicle was taken in for a routine service check at the dealer and the mechanic informed her that the rear subframe was rusted and the vehicle was unsafe to drive. The contact was informed that the part was on back order. The manufacturer was not contacted. The failure mileage was 119,000.
the Rear Subrame CRACKED while Driving, Almost causing a Major accident with my son in the car as well. This seems to be a MAJOR problem being overlooked and ignored by Mercedes Benz . This repair is going to Cost me $ 3000-$ 5000 Dollars. and the Replacement Subframe is Impossible to find and on Back order ! so Now I'm without a Vehicle for God knows How long ?? I Feel there is No Doubt this is a Defect and Should be Covered by Mercedes Benz and a Recall ! How is this not being investigated is Really Scary. How can a Frame or a Car just Crack ? That's Not safe for ANYBODY !
- Right Rear Subframe; Yes, available for inspection. - My mechanic told me that driving the car more than 2 miles or at a high rate of speed was very dangerous. He told me there that if the car braked quickly or was driven at a high rate of speed that there was a very good chance of an accident. There is a risk of the right control arm detaching from the frame; this could cause the car to be uncontrollable with the right rear wheel and control arm detaching from the vehicle. - Yes, the issue was confirmed by my mechanic, who works at an independent service center. - No. - There were no warning lamps or messages. I had begun to hear a loud clunking noise, usually when braking.
Showing 1–20 of 38 complaints
Complaints are unverified consumer reports submitted to NHTSA. A high complaint count may reflect vehicle popularity, not defect severity. Data sourced from NHTSA public records.
Data synced from NHTSA on Apr 25, 2026