NHTSA Owner Complaint Log
This page lists owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA for the 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. Complaints are unverified consumer reports submitted to NHTSA and do not by themselves prove a defect or defect rate.
Data synced from NHTSA on May 4, 2026
Vehicle experienced the recalled HVBJB failure around November 21, 2022 at 13,000 miles. The failed device was replaced. Around July 12, 2023 at 23,000 miles, the replaced HVBJB device failed again and was once again replaced. It seems that the replacement device does not resolve the issue. Both times, the vehicle was traveling on the highway and the vehicle performance was instantly restricted causing a dangerous situation where I had to immediately move over to the right lane without any acceleration power to navigate around large trucks.
The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach E. The contact stated while driving at an undisclosed speed with the Adaptive Cruise Control activated, the steering wheel jerked in the direction of oncoming traffic. The contact depressed the brake pedal and steered the vehicle back into the correct lane. The contact stated that the “Driver Assist Not Available” message was displayed. The contact stated that the message was displayed after the vehicle jerked and steered into the oncoming traffic. The contact stated that the failure had been reoccurring for approximately one year. The vehicle was taken to the dealer. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired by an independent mechanic or dealer. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 500.
Power steering went out including 10+ error / fault codes displaying on the dash on the vehicle after planned having vehicle towed but was back to normal after a restart. Exiting the parking lot at a low speed power steering failed again resulting in a low speed crash. After having it towed to dealership they reviewed software on the vehicle seeing vehicle has has fault codes and module errors for 3+ months on their Ford telemetries cloud system showing module and system errors every other day. Dealership asked if I ever got notice via vehicle or app about these errors which I never received. Ford Legal was notified and said vehicle did have a possible Bluecruise recall and nothing wrong with vehicle without having a Ford Engineer viewing the vehicle. My dealership still said cloud system showed all these errors which didn't seem be an issue to ford. My insurance said they'd make repairs but if my dealership said vehicle isn't safe they recommenced fix what is needed which Ford said 0 issues.
THE BATTERY ENERGY CONTROL MODULE RECALL SOFTWARE UPDATE WAS COMPLETED ON MY VEHICLE ON SEPTEMBER 22ND 2022 AT 1203 PM AT GOSCH FORD OF HEMET. UPON LEAVING AROUND A MILE DOWN THE ROAD I WAS DRIVING AROUND A CORNER. WHILE IN THIS CORNER MULTIPLE THINGS HAPPENED AT THE SAME EXACT MOMENT. MY TRACTION LIGHT MOMENTARILY FLASHED ALONG WITH A SERVICE WRENCH. VEHICLE SKID PARTIALLY OFF-ROAD INTO THE DITCH. I LOST CONTROL FOR A BREIF MOMENT BUT WAS ABLE TO GAIN CONTROL BEFORE CRASHING. MY SPEED WAS DRASTICALLY REDUCED TO ABOUT 1/3 OF ITS NORMAL POWER. THE VEHICLE WOULD STILL DRIVE JUST MUCH SLOWER. UPON THIS HAPPENING I IMMEDIATELY TOOK MY VEHICLE BACK TO THE DEALERSHIP. THIS RECALL WAS VERY VAGUE. WHEN I WAS AT THE DEALERSHIP I INITIALLY ASKED THE FORD SERVICE SALESMAN DANIEL VENTURA IF THIS SOFTWARE CHANGED ANY ASPECT OF MY VEHICLES PERFORMANCE. HE THEN READ THE RECALL LETTER AND SAID IF IT DID IT NORMALLY WOULD SAY IT EITHER IN THE RECALL ITSELF OR THE LETTER FORD SENDS YOU THEY WOULD NORMALLYSAY IT IN IT. IT DID NOT MENTION THAT WHILE DRIVING THRU A CORNER IF YOU LOOSE POWER IN THE CAR DUE TO A BATTERY CONTROL MODULE FAILURE THAT YOU MAY LOOSE TRACTION AND LOOSE CONTROL OF THE CAR MOMENTARILY. THIS IS A VERY UNSAFE DRIVING CONDITION. FURTHERMORE WHEN I LEFT THE DEALERSHIP THE CAR DROVE DIFFERENTLY. IT SEEMED LIKE THE HORSE POWER WAS ABOUT 5-10 HP LESS THEN WHEN PURCHASED. IT FELT A LITTLE WEIRD TO GET USED TO DRIVING DOWN THE ROAD SINCE IT HAD A LITTLE BIT MORE PUSH THEN BEFORE. I MENTION THIS BECAUSE I BELIEVE THAT AS A CONSUMER I HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW THE SOFTWARE THAT IS GOING INTO MY CAR. IF ANY ADVERSE REACTION THAT MAY CAUSE ME A DIFFERENT DRIVING EXPERIENCE OR PUT MY LIFE AT RISK OF CRASHING SHOULD HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE SAFETY RECALL OR THE LETTER FORD HAD SENT US IN THE RECALL. I AM A FIRM BELIEVER THEY DO NOT WANT TO TELL US THAT THIS VEHICLE IS STILL NOT SAFE TO DRIVE AS WHAT HAPPENED TO ME HAVING THE BATTERY CONTROL MODULE FAILURE DURING CORNERING.
To whom it may concern, Today I washed my car for the first time. My brand new Mach-E that I purchased 2 weeks ago. While going through the car wash the charging port opened up and got soaked with soap and water. This effects the vehicle charging capability and cause an electric issue to the car.
While driving a warning message in red was displayed on the driver display indicating that the frunk(front trunk) hood was open and that the emergency frunk release had been activated. I pulled over and stopped and got out and closed the frunk hood. I continued driving and upon braking, the messages appeared again. This time I opened the hood and discovered that a folded hard-sided bag that was in the frunk had slid up against the emergency release button with enough force to trigger the emergency release.
Brought Mach-E into dealership on 8/31 for recall on battery. Recall is corrected via a software update the can had not applied on its own after the last month. Car was serviced in about 2 hours and returned along with paperwork stating the recall was applied. Upon entering the car a new warning light was illuminated showing the software update was not yet complete. I assumed this just needed some more time to finish so the vehicle was driven home. Once home I used the messages on the center display to apply the update now. After about 20 min the first failure indicated the update was not applied because prerequisites were not met. A second attempt to apply the update was made and failed again. The failure clearly states it was not applied and that the update was intended to fix the specified recall. The car was immediately returned to the dealership with the error light still on at which point the service manager starts saying he’s sure they applied it but maybe the car didn’t take it. After some review the dealership they say they think the error is a conflict between the dealerships update and the over the air update systems but they believe it was actually installed even though the car says it failed. Due to other problems I’ve had at this dealership and the conflict of information at hand I don’t really have any way of knowing if this was properly applied. The dealership has asked to wait and check on it later to see if the errors continue.
The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang. The contact stated while pulling into a parking spot at approximately 2 MPH and had not yet placed the vehicle in park, the vehicle had an unintended acceleration. The contact stated no warning light was illuminated. The vehicle crashed into a light post, ran over the post, and crashed into a back of a building. The vehicle had damage to the hood, grill and bumper and also to the undercarriage. The contact said he had not suffered any injuries. The police were on the scene and filed a report. The contact had the vehicle towed to a collision repair shop. The vehicle had not been diagnosed by a dealer or independent mechanic. The vehicle had not been repaired. The contact researched online and related the failure to NHTSA Campaign Number: 22V333000 (Vehicle Speed Control, Power Train). The manufacturer had been informed of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 7,500.
Vehicle had an unintended acceleration resulting in crash in a parking lot.
Adaptive cruise control fault, pre-commission sensors not working, anti-lock break fault, restraint fault, tire pressure fault, dash turns off while driving which makes unable to see speed driving.
Recall for this Mustang MachE. Unable to update software. This is a safety item and the intended fix is implemented by the vehicle owner. Took vehicle today to the Lake Geneva Wisconsin Ford dealership on 08.03.2022. Appointment made in advance. Ford service representative stated that it would take at least a half day. Appears no one has been trained on implementation on corrective actions. Other issue with navigation.
I was pulling into my garage, steering with my left hand, making a slow, tight left turn from the drive way into the perpendicular garage. As the steering wheel turned, I believe my left palm hit the cruise control button and activated the adaptive cruise control. The vehicle suddenly accelerated toward the house without warning. I slammed on the brakes in response, tossing my wife forward and then back into her seat. When I looked at the dash immediately following the stop, the cruise control image was displayed showing the range keeping bars. There were two conditions present that should have prevented the cruise control from accelerating. First, the tight turn of the wheels to the left should have prevented acceleration and two, the house directly in front of the adaptive sensors should have said "HEY! There's a big object right in front of me, we should probably stop, not speed up!" A GIF video from my surveillance camera is attached to this report showing the incident.
This incident occurred on July 15th 2022. The dealership, Koons Falls Church Ford, located in Falls Church VA, sold us a car with an active recall on it. About 3 days after the car leaving the lot, the service department contacted us about a recall notice that needed to be resolve via software update. This issue could lead to the entire car losing power while in motion, recall number 22V412000. This information WAS NOT disclosed to us at any time during the sales process, and we did not find out until later that evening when looking for accessories online. VIN: [XXX] INFORMATION Redacted PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6).
The HVBJB subassembly in ALL Ford Mach-e vehicles has known defects with under-designed main contactors that are known to fail under normal charging and driving conditions as outlined in current open Ford recall notice for my vehicle 22S41. Unfortunately, the internal damage to contactors is not visible externally, and warning notices on display only after damage has occurred, and can result in sudden loss of propulsion power at highway speed, loss of power steering, power brakes, and failure of other 12v systems due to failure to charge the 12v battery properly after contactors are damaged. Less catastrophic results can include failure to start; which can strand driver's and passengers in remote areas, bad weather conditions, as well as cause loss of use for weeks due to delays in replacement parts and local Dealerships needing equipment and training to effect removal/replacement of faulty unit with a new HVBJB having re-designed components capable of meeting safety and normal usage requirements of Mach E owners.? ? My complaint is that Ford's recall notice 22S41 is a software-only attempt to prevent future damage, and does not require removal of the part(s) which are KNOWN TO FAIL to be replaced with the re-designed components which are available, and have been used to repair failures under warranty. I have no way of inspecting the original equipment to evaluate current condition; and failure can result in sudden and unexpected loss of power, steering, and braking as well as potentially stranding me in unsafe conditions unable to re-start my vehicle.? ? I would like to see NHTSA require that the Ford recall include both improved software AND removal/replacement of the HVBJB sub-assembly with the new appropriately specified parts.? Failure examples: https://www.macheforum.com/site/threads/-post-battery-contactor-recall-first-junction-box-failure-.19209/ and https://www.macheforum.com/site/threads/post-recall-software-hvbjb-failure.19396/
The High Voltage Battery Junction Box (HVBJB) in ALL Ford Mustang Mach-E vehicles has known defects with faulty main contactors that are known to fail under normal charging and driving conditions as outlined in current open Ford recall notice for my vehicle 22S41. Unfortunately, the internal damage to contactors is not visible externally, and warning notices on display only after damage has occurred, and can result in sudden loss of propulsion power at highway speed, loss of power steering, and power brakes...and failure of other 12v systems due to failure to charge the 12v battery properly after contactors are damaged. Less catastrophic results can include failure to start; which can strand driver's and passengers in remote areas, bad weather conditions, as well as cause loss of use for weeks due to delays in replacement parts and local Dealerships needing equipment and training to effect removal/replacement of faulty High Voltage Battery Junction Box (HVBJB) with a new one. ? My complaint is that Ford's recall notice 22S41 is a software-only attempt to prevent future damage, and does not require removal of the part(s) which are known to fail to be replaced with the re-designed components which are available, and have been used to repair failures under warranty. I have no way of inspecting the original equipment to evaluate current condition; and failure can result in sudden and unexpected loss of power, steering, and braking as well as potentially stranding me in unsafe conditions unable to re-start my vehicle.? ? I would like to see NHTSA strengthen the Ford recall to include both improved software AND removal/replacement of the High Voltage Battery Junction Box (HVBJB) with a new one.
The HVBJB subassembly in ALL Ford Mach-e vehicles has known defects with 'under-designed' main contactors that are known to fail under normal charging and driving conditions as outlined in current open Ford recall notice for my vehicle 22s41. Unfortunately, the internal damage to contactors is not visible externally, and warning notices on display only after damage has occurred, and can result in sudden loss of propulsion power at highway speed, loss of power steering, and power brakes... and failure of other 12v systems due to failure to charge the 12v battery properly after contactors are damaged. Less catastrophic results can include failure to start; which can 'strand' driver's and passengers in remote areas, bad weather conditions, as well as cause loss of use for weeks due to delays in replacement parts and local Dealerships needing equipment and training to effect removal/replacement of faulty unit with a new HVBJB having re-designed 'beefier' components. My complaint is that Ford's recall notice 22s41 is a software-only attempt to prevent future damage, and does not require removal of the part(s) which are KNOWN TO FAIL to be replaced with the re-designed components which are available, and have been used to repair failures under warranty. I have no way of inspecting the original equipment to evaluate current condition; and failure can result in sudden and unexpected loss of power, steering, and braking as well as potentially 'stranding me' in unsafe conditions unable to re-start my vehicle.? ? I would like to see NHTSA strengthen the Ford recall to include both improved software AND removal/replacement of the HVBJB sub-assembly with the new 'beefier' parts.
2 times we have had an incident in which the vehicle at a slow speed when parking or switching between drive gear and reverse gear. The vehicle suddenly accelerates forward and the driver has to engage the brakes manually very firmly to prevent an accident.
The HVBJB subassembly in ALL Ford Mach-e vehicles has known defects with 'under-designed' main contactors that are known to fail under normal charging and driving conditions as outlined in current open Ford recall notice for my vehicle 22s41. Unfortunately, the internal damage to contactors is not visible externally, and warning notices on display only after damage has occurred, and can result in sudden loss of propulsion power at highway speed, loss of power steering, and power brakes... and failure of other 12v systems due to failure to charge the 12v battery properly after contactors are damaged. Less catastrophic results can include failure to start; which can 'strand' driver's and passengers in remote areas, bad weather conditions, as well as cause loss of use for weeks due to delays in replacement parts and local Dealerships needing equipment and training to effect removal/replacement of faulty unit with a new HVBJB having re-designed 'beefier' components. My complaint is that Ford's recall notice 22s41 is a software-only attempt to prevent future damage, and does not require removal of the part(s) which are KNOWN TO FAIL to be replaced with the re-designed components which are available, and have been used to repair failures under warranty. I have no way of inspecting the original equipment to evaluate current condition; and failure can result in sudden and unexpected loss of power, steering, and braking as well as potentially 'stranding me' in unsafe conditions unable to re-start my vehicle. I would like to see NHTSA strengthen the Ford recall to include both improved software AND removal/replacement of the HVBJB sub-assembly with the new 'beefier' parts.
The HVBJB (high-voltage battery junction box) subassembly in ALL Ford Mach-e vehicles has known defects with insufficiently robust main contactors that are known to fail under normal charging and driving conditions as outlined in NHTSA Campaign Number 22V412000. Unfortunately, the internal damage to contactors is not visible externally, and warning notices on display only after damage has occurred, and can result in sudden loss of propulsion power at highway speed, loss of power steering, and power brakes, as well as failure of other 12V systems due to inability to charge the 12V battery properly after contactors are damaged. Less catastrophic results can include failure to start, which can strand drivers and passengers in remote areas, bad weather conditions, and also cause loss of use for weeks due to delays in replacement parts and local dealerships needing equipment and training to effect removal/replacement of faulty unit with a new, more robust HVBJB. My complaint is that Ford's recall under campaign 22V412000 is a software-only attempt to prevent future damage, and does not require the part(s) which are KNOWN to fail to be replaced with the re-designed components which are available, and have been used to repair failures under warranty. I have no way of inspecting the original equipment to evaluate current condition; and failure can result in sudden and unexpected loss of power, steering, and braking as well as potentially stranding me in unsafe conditions unable to restart my vehicle. I would like to see NHTSA strengthen the Ford recall to include both improved software AND removal/replacement of the HVBJB sub-assembly with the new, more robust parts without a known failure risk. Thank you very much for your time.
faulty high voltage battery junction box NHTSA Campaign Number: 22V412000
On 3 occasions in the past month I have been driving down the road and, without any action from me, cruise control has turned itself on, with a speed set above the speed limit. I noticed it because the car accelerated to reach the target speed (which was an unsafe speed). I immediately braked and turned off the cruise control. The first two times it happened, I was pretty sure I had not accidentally activated cruise control by touching the button on the steering wheel. The third time, I was on a straight stretch of highway and was 100% sure I had done nothing to activate cruise control I had not used cruise control at any point from the time I turned on the car until the time this happened. I was between 10 and 15 minutes into my trip when this occurred.